The Effect of Public Sector Accounting Implementation to Prevent Fraud in the Public Sector in the Digital Era at PT. PLN UP3 Binjai
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This study supposed to determine the effect of the application of public sector accounting to prevent fraud in the public sector in the digital era at Pt. Pln Up3 Binjai The method used by the author in this research is This research uses qualitative descriptive research methods. This qualitative descriptive research is to determine the role of public sector accounting to prevent fraud in the public sector in the digital era at PT. PLN Up3 Binjai. This descriptive study aims to provide researchers with a history or to describe aspects relevant to the phenomenon of attention from the perspective of an organization. The type of data the author uses in this research is qualitative data. This qualitative data is obtained from direct interviews with the Internal Supervisory Unit (SPI) regarding the Role of the Internal Supervisory Unit in fraud prevention at PT PLN UP3 Binjai. The results of the conclusions in this study are the first characteristics of fraud in the public sector that occur in the digital era, including the use of misconceptions about the role of digital technology in carrying out the duties of public accountants, utilizing digital technology to optimize opportunities for fraud, taking advantage of problems in human error and lack of knowledge in the use of digital technology, using digital technology products. Furthermore, the application of Public Sector Accounting can prevent fraud in the public sector in the digital era if implemented by considering factors that affect fraud, such as performance accountability, and accompanied by the application of fraud prevention methods which include technical strategies, two paradigm approaches, and preventive strategies.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Akuntansi, I. (2016). Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Revisi. Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia.
Albrecht, W. S., & Albrecht, C. O. (2012). Fraud Examination (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Antarwiyati, P., & Purnomo, R. E. (2017). Motivasi melakukan frauddan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 12(2).
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2019). Survei Fraud di Indonesia.
Bastian, I. (2015). Lingkup Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Erlangga.
Donning, H., & Eriksson, M. (2019). Prevention And Detection For Risk And Fraud In The Digital Age – The Current Situation. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 8, 86–97.
Dwiyanto, A. (2002). Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. PSKK - UGM.
Enyi, P., & Enyi. (2019). Relational Trend Analysis: A Simple and Effective Way To Detect Financial Statements Fraud. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 9(2538–546). https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.9.02.2019.p86609
Free C. (2015). Looking through the fraud triangle: a review and call for new directions. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(2).
Halim, A. (2014). Manajemen Keuangan Sektor Publik. Salemba Empat.
Iwan Fahri Cahyadi. (2019). Peranan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi dan Tantangan Profesi Akuntan di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 (Sebuah Studi Fenomenologi). Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah, 2(1).
Jones, P., & J.Bates. (1990). Public Sector Auditing: Practical Techniques For An Integrated Approach,. Chapman and Hall.
Kristiyani, D., & Hamidah, H. (2020). Model Penerapan Akuntansi Sektor Publik Untuk Mencegah Fraud Pada Sektor Publik Di Era Digital. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 22(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v22i2.732
Kuswanto, A. (2020). Ini Bentuk Kecurangan Dan Korupsi Finansial di Era Digitalisasi. Bukamata.Com.
Mahmudi. (2007). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor publik (1th ed.). UPP STIM YKPN.
Mwita, J. I. (2000). Performance Management Model, a System-Based Approach to Quality. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13, 19–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550010334461
Nasib, E. A. B. P. L. H. M. (2023). The Impact Of Npm, Roi, Roe And Cash Ratio On Financial Distress (Study Of Manufacturing Companies In The Consumption Goods Industrial Sector Listed On The Indonesia Stock Exchange In 2019 - 2021). Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(02), 888–899.
Nasib, N. Li. N. N. A. S. A. D. M. R. (2023). Integration of Financial Capability and The Economy of North Sumatra (Panel Regression Model). The International Conference on Education, Social, Sciences and Technology (ICESST), 2(2), 182–190.
Pasaribu, D. T. A. H. N. W. H. H. D. (2024). The Role of Financial Literacy and Self-Motivation in Fostering Entrepreneurial Interest and Self-Efficacy among University Students. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 11(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.33168/JLISS.2024.0109
Santoso, U., & Pambelum, Y. J. (2008). Pengaruh Penerapan Akuntansi Sektor Publik Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Dalam Mencegah Fraud. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (, 4(1).
Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Septarini, D. F., & Frans Papilaya. (2016). Interaksi Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi & Sosial Unmus, 11(4).
Sihombing, E., Erlina, Rujiman, & Muda, I. (2019). The Effect Of Forensic Accounting, Training, Experience, Work Load And Professional Skeptic On Auditors Ability To Detect Of Fraud. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Thanasak Ruankaew, P. (2016). Beyond the Fraud Diamond. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research(IJBMER, 7(1). https://doi.org/2229- 6247
Wahyuni, W., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2017). Fraud Triangle Sebagai Pendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 21(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v21i1.133