The Effect of Parasocial Intervention on Purchase Intention with Consumer Online Purchase Behavior as an Intervention Variable in Fashion Products
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62398/probis.v14i5.314Keywords:
Parasocial, Purchase Intention, Consumer, Online, Purchase BehaviorAbstract
This study aims to explore the relationship between parasocial interaction and purchase intention (Interest in Shopping) and how consumer online purchase behavior acts as an intermediary variable. The quantitative method used in this research is the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) approach. Hypotheses are tested via statistical t tests. Data was collected through a questionnaire distributed to 211 respondents who were followers of Zara's social media accounts and had never purchased products from this brand. The research was conducted for 4 months, from February to May 2022. The results showed that parasocial interactions had a 54% influence on consumer online purchasing behavior, 39% on purchasing interest, and consumer online purchasing behavior had a 42% influence on purchasing interest. Apart from that, consumer online purchasing behavior also acts as an intermediary variable with an influence of 22%. This research provides insight into how parasocial interactions influence purchase intention and through what mechanisms consumers' online purchasing behavior plays a role in this relationship
References
Chen, T. Y., Yeh, T. L., & Lee, F. Y. (2021). The impact of Internet celebrity characteristics on followers’ impulse purchase behavior: the mediation of attachment and parasocial interaction. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 483–501.
Chetioui, Y., Benlafqih, H., & Lebdaoui, H. (2020). How fashion influencers contribute to consumers’ purchase intention. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 24(3), 361–380.
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Konsep, teknik, aplikasi menggunakan Smart PLS 3.0 untuk penelitian empiris. BP Undip. Semarang.
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229.
Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 155–173.
Jin, S. V., Ryu, E., & Muqaddam, A. (2021). I trust what she’s# endorsing on Instagram: moderating effects of parasocial interaction and social presence in fashion influencer marketing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 25(4), 665–681.
Lou, C., & Kim, H. K. (2019). Fancying the new rich and famous? Explicating the roles of influencer content, credibility, and parental mediation in adolescents’ parasocial relationship, materialism, and purchase intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2567.
Schiffman, L., & Kanuk, L. L. (2010). Consumer Behaviour (10th ed). In Consumer Behavior (!0th). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742.
Sumarliah, E., Khan, S. U., & Khan, I. U. (2021). Online hijab purchase intention: the influence of the Coronavirus outbreak. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(3), 598–621.
Vazquez, D., & Xu, X. (2006). Investigating linkages between online purchase behaviour variables. 2000–2006. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550910954900
Vazquez, D., & Xu, X. (2009). Investigating linkages between online purchase behaviour variables. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37(5), 408–419.
Widiyanto, I., & Prasilowati, S. L. (2015). Perilaku pembelian melalui internet. 17(2), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.17.2.109
Wiedmann, K.-P., & Von Mettenheim, W. (2020). Attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise–social influencers’ winning formula? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(5), 707–725.
1.jpg){kind=logo}
