Effect of Female Board of Commissioners, Managerial Ownership and Debt Policy on Tax Aggressiveness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62398/probis.v14i5.305Keywords:
Female Board of Commissioners, Managerial Ownership, Debt Policy, Tax AggressivenessAbstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the influence of female commissioners, managerial ownership and debt policy on tax aggressiveness. This article is based on agency theory, namely to understand the relationship between variables. The object of this article is a mining sector company, the Coal subsector on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI) is used as a research object. The sample used was 15 companies during 2016-2018. The method used in sampling is purposive sampling. Data analysis uses classical assumption tests and hypothesis testing using the multiple linear regression method. The results of the research show that Women's Board of Commissioners, Managerial Ownership and Debt Policy have no influence on Tax Aggressiveness. The control variable measurement of leverage has a significant relationship to tax aggressiveness and measurements of company age, company size and probability do not have a significant relationship to Tax Aggressiveness.
References
Atari, J. (2016). "pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dan kebijakan hutang terhadap tax aggressive". Fekon, 3(1), 1137–1149.
Dewi, S. C. (2008). "pengaruh kepemilikan managerial, kepemilikan institusional, kebijakan hutang, profitabilitas dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kebijakan dividen". Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 10(1), 47–58..
Gujarati, D. (1995). "Basic Econometric". Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Hanim, H., & Fatahurrazak. (2018). "pengaruh dewan komisaris, komisaris independen, dan kompensasi dewan komisaris dan direksi terhadap tindakan agresivitas pajak". Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Finansial Indonesia, 1(2), 37–50.
Hartadinata, O. S., & Tjaraka, H. (2013). "analisis pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, kebijakan hutang, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap tax agressiveness". Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, (3), 48–59.
Hidayat, A. T., & Fitria, E. F. (2018). "capital intensity, inventory intensity, profitabilitas dan leverage terhadap agresivitas pajak". Stiedewantara, 13(2), 157–168.
Kalbuana, N., Purwanti, T., & Agustin, N. H. (2017). "pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, beban pajak tangguhan, dan tingkat pajak efektif terhadap penghindaran pajak". Magistra, (100), 26–35.
Lubis, I., Suryani, & Anggraeni, F. (2018). "pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial dan kebijakan utang terhadap agresivitas pajak". Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 7(2), 211–226.
Manning, M. L., & Munro, D. (2004). "The business survey researcher’s SPSS cookbook (2nd ed)". Sydney: Pearson Education.
Mardiyati, U., Ahmad, G. N., & Putri, R. (2012). "pengaruh kebijakan dividen, kebijakan hutang dan profitabilitas terhadap nilai perusahaan". Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.34209/equ.v18i2.467
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958)." the cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment" American Economic Review, 48(3), 260–297. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.3594.952
Suliyanto. (2011). "Uji Asumsi Klasik Autokorelasi. In Ekonometrika Terapan : Teori & Aplikasi dengan SPSS".
White, H. (1980). "A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity". Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.
Zahirah, A. (2017). "pengaruh leverage, kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan manajerial dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap penghindaran pajak". JOM Fekon, 4(1), 3543–3556.
1.jpg){kind=logo}
