##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Farida Rohmah

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of government investment in the trade sector carried out in preparation for the Asean Economy Community on the distribution of household income. “Simulation for Social Indicators and Poverty: IO and SAM Analysis” (SimSIP SAM). The first analytical tool used is to analyze export imports that occur in ASEAN countries against Indonesia using OLS Regression. This is done to see how the trade sector is happening in ASEAN countries as an impact of investment in the trade sector. After it is known that investment in the trade sector is known, then the analysis used is the Simulation for Social Indicators and Poverty: IO and SAM Analysis” (SimSIP SAM) to determine the multiplier impact that has occurred in Indonesia. The results of the analysis show that government investment of IDR 27 trillion in the trade sector has an impact on: (1) total household income reaching IDR 74 trillion or an increase of 1.94 percent;

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Rohmah, F. (2022). The Effect of The Asean Economic Community on Household Income in Indonesia: . ProBisnis : Jurnal Manajemen, 13(2), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.62398/probis.v13i2.96
References
Achsani, N. A. 2008. Integrasi Ekonomi ASEAN+3: Antara Peluang dan Ancaman. Brighten Institute, Bogor.
Arifin, Syamsul, at. al. 2007. Integrasi Keuangan dan Moneter di Asia Timur: Peluang dan Tantangan bagi Indonesia. Elex media Komputindo. Jakarta.
Bachtiar, Nurzaman. 1990. Perkembangan Paling akhir Teori Perdagangan Internasional : Pendekatan Empiris. Bandung.
Boediono. 1994. Ekonomi Internasional. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Deliarnov. 1995. Pengantar Ekonomi Makro. Jakarta: Bina Grafika.
Fiess, Norbert. 2005. Business Cycle Syncronization and Regional Integration: A Case Study for Central America. Working Paper. Diakses dari www.worldbank.org. Tanggal 23 Oktober 2013
Frankel, Jeffrey, and Andrew Rose. 1998. The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria. Economic Journal 108 (449): 1009–25
Hadis, Syafril. 1996. Ekonomi Internasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Haryadi. 2008. Dampak Liberalisasi Perdagangan Terhadap Perekonomian Negara Maju dan Berkembang. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pembangunan, Volume 9 Nomor 2, 1942- 1958.
Krugman, P.R. 1993. Free Trade: A Loss (Theoritical) Nerve (The Narrow and Broad Agreements for Free Trade. American Economic Review. Vol.83, No.2, pp. 362-365.
Lapipi. 2005. Analisis Efek Integrasi Ekonomi ASEAN dan Manfaatnya Bagi Perdagangan Negara-Negara ASEAN [Thesis]. Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Indonesia.
Meier, G.M. 1995. Leading Issues In Economic Development. New York: Oxford Unversity Press.
Nopirin. 1991. Ekonomi Internasional Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Ohmae, K. (1995), "The End of The Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies", New York : The Free Press.
Pelkman, G. (2003). The challenge of enlargement of Euroland. Workshop on EMU Current state and future prospects. University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece.
Rana, Pradumna.B. 2007. Trade Intensity and Business Cycle Syncronization: The Case of East Asia. Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration. No.10. Asian Development Bank.
Salvatore, D. 1997. International Economics. Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Shin, Kwanho dan Yunjong Wang. 2004. Trade Integration and Business Cycle Synchronization in East Asia. Asian Economic Papers Teng, Kwek Kian dan Way, Cho Cho. 2005. Trade Integration and Business Cycle Syncronization: The Case of India, China with ASEAN- 5. didownload dari www. pes.org.ph/faea/ downloads/paper/3/pararell3b1.pdf pada tanggal 23 Oktober 2013.
Sukirno, S., 2000, Pengantar Teori Makro Ekonomi, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suarez, M.D.L.C. 2001. Trace Creation and Trade Diversion For Mercosur. Disertation. Boston University
Viner, Jacob (1950).The Customs Union Issue, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York