Analysis of Performance Evaluation of Economic Development of the District / City Of Pemekaran in the Nias Region

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Published: Apr 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62398/probis.v12i1.3
Keywords:
Economic development performance, Indexation, Effectiveness, Relevance
Issue
Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): April: Management Science
Section
Articles
Statistics Article
Article View : 37 Times

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Selamat Berkat Perlindungan Zebua
Universitas Sumatera Utara

Abstract

This study should be analyzed and evaluated the economic development. Data used in this study are Economic Growth, Gross Regional Domestic Product at Current Market Prices, Gross Regional Domestic Product at Constant Prices, Gross Regional Domestic of Product Percapita, Regency/City Local Government Original Receipt, Income Distribution, Poverty Index, and unemployment during 2011-2015. Evaluation in this study is use the indexation method, descriptive method by analyzing the ratio between time, comparison with the achievements of the district/city division, policy recommendations, and analysis of effectiveness and relevance indicators of economic development. From the analysis conducted, the index of economic performance of the district/city division has been achieved with good and has increased.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Zebua, S. B. P. . (2021). Analysis of Performance Evaluation of Economic Development of the District / City Of Pemekaran in the Nias Region. ProBisnis : Jurnal Manajemen, 12(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.62398/probis.v12i1.3
References
Arsyad, Lincolin, 2013. Ekonomi Pembangunan, Bagian Penerbitan STIE YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (BAPPENAS) dan United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2008. “Studi Evaluasi Dampak Pemekaran Daerah 2001-2007”, Building and Reinventing Decentralised Governance (BRIDGE).
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Gunungsitoli, 2016. Kota Gunungsitoli Dalam Angka 2016, Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Gunungsitoli, Gunungsitoli.
Badan Pusat Statistik Sumatera Utara, 2016. Sumatera Utara Dalam Angka 2016, Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Capello, Roberta, 2011. “Location, Regional Growth and Local Development Theories”. AESTIMUM 58, 1-25.
Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan Kementrian Keuangan. Realisasi APBD Pemerintah Daerah Tahun 2006-2015, DJPK Sumatera Utara.
Direktorat Otonomi Daerah Deputi Bidang Pengembangan Regional dan Otonomi Daerah, 2008. “Studi Evaluasi (Impact) Penataan Daerah Otonom Baru Tahun 2008”, Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (BAPPENAS).
Fahrul, Muhhamad, 2011. “Efektifitas Dan Relevansi Kinerja Ekonomi Kota Medan Terhadap Sumatera Utara”, Skripsi, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Gaus, Tio Lestari, 2016. “Analisis Evaluasi Kinerja Pembangunan Ekonomi Kota Medan”, Skripsi, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Howard, Dennis, 2007. “The Regional Business Performance Monitor – a Cheap Tool For Regional Planning”, Proceedings of Small Enterprice Conference – building sustainable growth in SMEs, Manukau, New Zealand.
Kuncoro, Mudrajad, 2004. Otonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah: Reformasi, Perencanaan, Strategi, dan Peluang, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Rachim, Ratri Furry Pustika, 2013. “Evaluasi Pemekaran Wilayah Kota Serang Ditinjau Dari Kinerja Ekonomi Dan Kinerja Pelayanan Publik Daerah”, Skripsi, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Rahardja, Pratama, 2008. Teori Ekonomi Makro, Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Ramadhani, Kiki Riski, 2015. “Analisis Evaluasi Kinerja Pembangunan Ekonomi Kabupaten/Kota Pemekaran Di Sumatera Utara”, Skripsi, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Sukirno, Sadono, 2006. Ekonomi Pembangunan, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.
Todaro, Michael P, 1995. Ekonomi Untuk Negara Berkembang, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.